Category Archives: Readings

Practitioners

One of my favour­ite writers on prac­tice–John Pos­till–made an inter­est­ing reflec­tion on prac­ti­tion­ers and aca­dem­ics. He notes that: The con­ven­tional divide between ‘the­or­ists’ (e.g. media schol­ars) and ‘prac­ti­tion­ers’ (e.g. journ­al­ists who teach at aca­demic insti­tu­tions) that we find in higher edu­ca­tion par­lance is unhelp­ful. Both schol­ars and non-scholars are prac­ti­tion­ers, albeit of dif­fer­ent kinds. That is,

Ten years to master …

In an inter­est­ing post by Peter Nor­vig says talks about how long it takes to develop expert­ise. I’ve some­what quoted him here; with a few tweaks to the con­tem­por­ary ref­er­ences. Research­ers (Bloom & Sosniak, 1985; Bryan & Harter, 1899; Hayes, 1981; Sim­mon & Chase,1973) have shown it takes about ten years to develop expert­ise in

Whither learning styles?

The Chron­icle of Higher Edu­ca­tion led me to an inter­est­ing art­icle on learn­ing styles by Pashler, McDaniel, Rohrer, and Bjork (2009). The sum­mary of the art­icle out­lines the idea of learn­ing styles: The term ”learn­ing styles” refers to the concept that indi­vidu­als dif­fer in regard to what mode of instruc­tion or study is most effect­ive for

Discuss

It is exactly in those organ­iz­a­tions in which con­trol through the nar­row­ing, trivi­al­iz­a­tion, and decom­pos­i­tion of full par­ti­cip­a­tion is most common–in schools and workplaces–that learn­ing is most often an insti­tu­tional motive and yet, by the argu­ment here, most likely to fail” (Lave, 1991, p. 78). p=. Ref­er­ences Lave, J. (1991). Situ­at­ing learn­ing in com­munit­ies of prac­tice. In

Playing with game theory

In a recent art­icle Varoufa­kis (2008, p.1259–1260) says: bq.. To give an example, con­sider the fol­low­ing simple N-person game known as the Race-to-Zero. N play­ers are asked to write on a piece of paper (in isol­a­tion from one another) a real num­ber between 0 and 100 (inclus­ive). The player whose chosen num­ber is nearest the

Reviewing

Today, I saw “Pro­fessor Yehuda Baruch”:http://www.uea.ac.uk/nbs/people/People/Academic/Yehuda+Baruch from the Uni­ver­sity of East Anglia at Nor­wich run a work­shop called _Opening the black box of aca­demic review­ing and edit­ing _. The ses­sion was jointly hos­ted by the “depart­ment of Man­age­ment and Inter­na­tional Business”:http://www.business.auckland.ac.nz/comwebContent/sitemanager/index.cfm?fs=pgv&pageid=23121 and the “depart­ment of Psychology”:http://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/. It was a most inform­at­ive ses­sion, so much so

Industry Recipes

I was track­ing down some inform­a­tion on meth­od­o­logy (in par­tic­u­lar the work of “J-C Spender”:http://www.jcspender.com/ when I came across his web site. It put me on to a good Org. The­ory site, called (unsur­pris­ingly) “OrgTheory”:http://orgtheory.wordpress.com/ Any­way, going back to John-Christopher, one of his best works is: bq. Spender, J.-C. (1989). _Industry recipes: An enquiry into

Choosing among projects of action

I’ve men­tioned “elsewhere”:http://www.petersmith.org/blog/archives/2004/06/what-is-agency.html Emirbayer & Minche’s great art­icle on agency. In that art­icle they refer to pro­jects of action, and in par­tic­u­lar an piece by Alfred Schutz, namely: bq. Schutz, A. (1962). Choos­ing among pro­jects of action. In M. A. Natan­son (Ed.), _Collected papers: Volume 1, The prob­lem of social reality_ (pp. 67–98). The Hague:

That’s interesting

I was at a sem­inar to day with Anne Huff when she men­tioned an old art­icle by Mur­ray Davis. We’ll I’m always a sucker for a good ref­er­ence, so I duti­fully went and had a look at “Google”:http://www.google.com/search?q=davis+%22that%27s+interesting%22. The “first”:http://www.sfu.ca/~palys/interest.htm ref­er­ence it through up (which has a bit of sum­mary of the art­icle) provided enough

Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes

A romp through: bq. Green­wood, R., & Hin­ings, C. R. (1993). Under­stand­ing stra­tegic change: The con­tri­bu­tion of arche­types. _Academy of Man­age­ment Journal_, 36(5), 1052–1081. The abstract says: bq. We examined the concept of arche­type, impli­cit in a num­ber of con­tem­por­ary approaches to the study of organ­iz­a­tional design and change. Des­pite an emer­ging interest in arche­types,

Some problems in market distribution

In his clas­sic art­icle, Arch W. Shaw explores _Some prob­lems in mar­ket distribution_ (Shaw, 1912). He describes how pro­duc­tion is only one half of industry; hav­ing pro­duced the product it needs to be dis­trib­uted. The choice of method to dis­trib­ute the product needs care­ful con­sid­er­a­tion. Selling dir­ect to cus­tom­ers, using one’s own salespeople, using whole­salers,

Politics and the English Language

I was talk­ing with “Nigel Haworth”:http://staff.business.auckland.ac.nz/nhaworth today, and he poin­ted me towards an essay on improv­ing our use of the Eng­lish lan­guage by George Orwell. As far as I can tell, the piece is long out of copy­right, so I have repro­duced it here.