Category Archives: Strategy

Business policy and nGrams

Much has been writ­ten about the change from busi­ness policy to busi­ness strategy (aka stra­tegic man­age­ment). I thought it would be inter­est­ing to look at that change over time. So, search­ing Google’s cor­pus of ngram books I’ve tracked the rise and fall of busi­ness policy and busi­ness strategy. You can use busi­ness policy and stra­tegic

Strategy as practice

I’m step­ping down as the bib­li­o­grapher of the strategy-as-practice web­site. That site is going through a redesign, and as part of that, the team is con­sid­er­ing how/what to do with the bib­li­o­graphy. My own view is that a social bib­li­o­graphy, such as mine might be more use­ful than a stand alone bib­li­o­graphic silo. As many

SCP Framework

There is a really nice four minute present­a­tion of the SCP frame­work at “McKinsey”:http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Enduring_ideas_The_SCP_Framework_2169?pagenum=1#interactive_scp. Other _enduring ideas_ can be found “here”:http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Enduring_ideas_The_SCP_Framework_2169?pagenum=1#interactive_scp. All the endur­ing ideas aren’t ‘in place yet’, but McKin­sey are slowly rolling them out.

Operational effectiveness: Necessary but not sufficient

In his HBR art­icle _What Is Strategy_, Porter argues that oper­a­tional effect­ive­ness does not rep­res­ent a strategy. In other words, plan­ning to be the most “oper­a­tion­ally effect­ive” is not a strategy. But I won­der how true this is. Hav­ing looked at, and worked with, many SME (Small and medium enter­prises), they often have low levels

The BCG Matrix

h2. A quick guide to the BCG growth-share mat­rix. I often find that stu­dents under­stand the con­cepts behind the BCG growth-share mat­rix, but don’t know what ‘num­bers’ to use when ‘draw­ing’ it. So here we are … The BCG growth share mat­rix is a tool for the eval­u­ation of the per­form­ance of a com­pany that

Playing with game theory

In a recent art­icle Varoufa­kis (2008, p.1259–1260) says: bq.. To give an example, con­sider the fol­low­ing simple N-person game known as the Race-to-Zero. N play­ers are asked to write on a piece of paper (in isol­a­tion from one another) a real num­ber between 0 and 100 (inclus­ive). The player whose chosen num­ber is nearest the

Frameworks revisited

I’ve just had my feed­back from the MBA class _Integrating Strategy_. Every­one one seems pretty happy except one per­son who gave me very low rat­ings. I struggled to make sense of this dis­par­ity until I read the com­ments that the stu­dent had made. bq. * Robust frame­work * Some of the cases are so vague

Strategic management and the philosophy of science

Paula Jar­z­ab­kowski (2004) has recently had one of art­icles pub­lished in Organ­iz­a­tion Stud­ies. Her art­icle is based on an earlier “work­ing paper”:http://research.abs.aston.ac.uk/working_papers/0212.pdf she wrote a few years ago. Good on her for get­ting it in to a tier-one journal. As it hap­pens, Paula will be vis­it­ing the “department”:http://www.business.auckland.ac.nz/comwebcontent/1/7/122/3579.html in Novem­ber and will be giv­ing a

Selected sound bites

A few Por­t­erian quotes taken from: *Har­field, T. (1997). Stra­tegic man­age­ment and Michael Porter: A post­mod­ern read­ing. _Electronic Journal of Rad­ical Oran­iz­a­tional The­ory, 4_(1).* bq. Com­pet­it­ive advant­age is hardly a new sub­ject. … mar­ket­ing, pro­duc­tion, con­trol, fin­ance, and many other activ­it­ies in a firm have a role in com­pet­it­ive advant­age. … Com­pet­it­ive advant­age can­not be

MECE

I read a bit. One book I that had some inter­est­ing ideas was “The McKin­sey way”:http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0070534489/103–4978139–4335007 by Ethan M. Rasiel. Many of the ideas are not new, the 80/20 rule, and elev­ator pitch, and so on, but it does talk about the need to be MECE (pro­nounced ‘me-se’) in writ­ing and think­ing. That is to

On becoming a critically reflexive practitioner

I’ve just received the last­est edi­tion of the “Journal of Man­age­ment Education”:http://www.sagepub.com/journal.aspx?pid=181, and there is an ele­ment of sychron­icity about it. The first art­icle is: *Cun­liffe, A. L. (2004). On becom­ing a crit­ic­ally reflect­ive prac­ti­tioner. _Journal of Man­age­ment Edu­ca­tion, 28_(4), 407–426.* In this art­icle, she writes about many of the things I’ve dis­cussed today, or

PhD Seminar

Today, I gave a depart­ment sem­inar on my PhD topic _Strategising in pro­fes­sional ser­vice firms_. I’ve pos­ted a copy of the “slides”:http://www.thereflectivepractitioner.org/ps/pdfs/Dept_Seminar.pdf in case any­one in inter­ested. If found it strangely nerve wrack­ing. As I said at the start of the present­a­tion “How do I know what I think until I’ve said it”. With such