Category Archives: Teaching

Highlighting learning

A report high­lighted by Times Ideas sug­gests that high­light­ing inform­a­tion as a form of learn­ing has little real impact over simply read­ing the mater­ial. Yet, the evid­ence (and my own exper­i­ence) is that this a very pop­u­lar way to aid ‘learn­ing’. The truth is that we do many things because we believe them to be

My BHAG

I have revis­ited The Ran­dom Thoughts of Louis Schmier and in par­tic­u­lar his post on the Teacher’s Oath. Louis has been writ­ing his ran­dom thoughts for dec­ades, and he has been act­ive in the OB Teach­ing Soci­ety (and prob­ably many other things) for way longer than I’ve been teach­ing. So, I’m a little bit sur­prised

Traffic and Ramblings

There has been a little bump in traffic, so I’ve kicked off AW Stats pro­cess to workout what/who/etc is hap­pen­ing. Tick. Tock. Tick. Tock. Tick. Ding. Okay, it looks like some of my cur­rent stu­dents have rumbled that this blog exists. That’s a bit later in the course than usual, but not unex­pec­ted. Most are using

Peer Evaluations

Our BUSINESS 101 course (aka Busi­ness and Enter­prise) is based on Team-based learn­ing and has an ele­ment of peer evaluation.This is based on the Michael­son (per­cent­age) method. We’ve just com­pleted a prac­tice run through and the res­ults are quite inter­est­ing (but not unex­pec­ted). Approx­im­ately half the class com­pleted the prac­tice team review. The dis­tri­bu­tion looks

Zotero and commas

One of the stu­dents in BUSINESS 101 noticed that in a ref­er­ence such as (Oram, 2007; 2011) I was using colons, instead of com­mas. They said it should be (Oram, 2007, 2011). I was away from the office (without a copy of the Pub­lic­a­tion manual of the APA to hand), and I said it might

Multitasking

There is an inter­est­ing art­icle over at McKin­sey on inform­a­tion over­load. But it also talked about the con­sequences of mul­ti­task­ing. There is a lot of pop­u­lar writ­ing about the cur­rent gen­er­a­tion doing a lot of mul­ti­task­ing. But I won­der where is the evid­ence that they are any bet­ter at it than any other gen­er­a­tion. My

Prescription for textbooks

I’ve talked else­where about the eco­nom­ics of text­books and my sur­prise at how much of the mark-up goes to the vari­ous parties. Any­way, on Boing Boing there is an inter­est­ing art­icle that dis­cusses the issue fur­ther (and provides some inter­est­ing links). The art­icle says: 5. Stu­dent beha­vior a. Stu­dents basic­ally func­tion as a cap­tive con­sumer audi­ence,

The paragraph

The para­graph is a con­tinu­ing source of mys­tery to me. What makes a really good para­graph? Is it as for­mu­laic as sug­ges­ted by Thomas Bas­bøll? Actu­ally, I’m doing a Thomas a great dis­ser­vice when I caste his writ­ing on para­graphs as being for­mu­laic. He, has writ­ten at length in a very nuanced man­ner about the

Boots and all

This semester I’m teach­ing BUSINESS 101 aka Busi­ness and enter­prise 1, here at school. We’ve a dis­cus­sion forum that is used within the course–but it may not work for no UoA people. Any­way, there is a sec­tion for intro­duc­tions, and, hav­ing seen the first half-dozen entries, such as: Woo 1st 1 to reply and find out

Yale on writing

Yale col­lege has some of the best resources on writ­ing that I’ve come across. One of the chal­lenges teach­ers face is to what extent should they draw on oth­ers mater­ial, as opposed to writ­ing their own “guides”. For example, the Yale mater­ial doesn’t quite fit in some areas. Should I: Refer stu­dents to their resource

Relating to relatedness

I think it was Stephen Turner (2007) who lamen­ted that much soci­olo­gical the­ory is unin­formed by our con­tem­por­ary under­stand­ing of neur­os­cience. David Rock, in series of art­icles (2006, 2009) looks at lead­er­ship and man­age­ment from the per­spect­ive of neur­os­cience. One par­tic­u­lar sec­tion caught my eye, in which he writes about teams; the Relat­ing to related­ness

The economics of textbook

Andrea James has been talk­ing about the eco­nom­ics of text­books, and how the money is dis­trib­uted. He reports that: Five con­glom­er­ates con­trol 80% of text­book pro­duc­tion. They sell their product to distributors/retailers, who in turn sell them to book­stores (on and off cam­pus, includ­ing inter­net). Four whole­salers dom­in­ate text­book dis­tri­bu­tion, espe­cially used books. These four whole­salers